bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#15801: 24.3.50; bar scrolling freezes gtk emacs


From: Jan Djärv
Subject: bug#15801: 24.3.50; bar scrolling freezes gtk emacs
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 12:07:07 +0100

1 dec 2013 kl. 11:43 skrev Jarek Czekalski <jarekczek@poczta.onet.pl>:

> 
> W dniu 2013-12-01 10:10, Jan Djärv pisze:
>> That brings back the error that commit fixed.
> 
> Your commit also did some optimizations. If the commit really treated only 
> the case of -nw switch, it would have no influence on scroll bars in gtk.
> 
> If you separate your joined commit (fixing and optimization) into 2 separate 
> commits, I can check which part introduces the problem.

I no longer know what commit you are talking about.  This:

=== modified file 'src/xgselect.c'
@@ -44,9 +44,13 @@

-  if (! (window_system_available (NULL)
-     && g_main_context_pending (context = g_main_context_default ())))
-    return pselect (fds_lim, rfds, wfds, efds, timeout, sigmask);
+  /* Do not try to optimize with an initial check with 
g_main_context_pending
+     and a call to pselect if it returns false.  If Gdk has a timeout 
for 0.01
+     second, and Emacs has a timeout for 1 second, 
g_main_context_pending will
+     return false, but the timeout will be 1 second, thus missing the gdk
+     timeout with a lot.  */
+
+  context = g_main_context_default ();



has absolutely nothing to do with -nw.  The bug is clearly described in the 
comment.
There is no optimization involved, in fact a bad optimization is removed.

As for your first fix, I assume you mean this:

+       // Sometimes gtk_events_pending is true, but gdk_event_handler
+       // receives nothing and does not increase the count.
+       // If we ignore these pending events, then we lock up,
+       // for example with continuos movements of vertical scroll bar.
+       if (!count) count = 1;


This basically introduces a busy wait, which is no good at all.  Note that 
Emacs is still running with SIGIO off with this patch, so while it may fix the 
symptoms, it does not fix the problem.

        Jan D.







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]