[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#16013: 24.3.50; Rows in height is interpreted as pixels.
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#16013: 24.3.50; Rows in height is interpreted as pixels. |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Dec 2013 19:06:04 +0100 |
> I now get 49 rows. That is the same I get with 24.3.
Interesting. 50 rows are too large for my frame so I test with 30 rows
and 60 columns. In this case I get what I specified. Which are the
values passed to gtk_window_resize on your system?
>> Unfortunately a second frame still sometimes gets three rows less. In
>> this regard the behavior here is the same as with 24.3. Any ideas?
>
> I don't see this in the trunk or 24.3. Rows are consistently 49.
Here the height decreases to 27 in, on the average, every second frame I
create via C-x 5 2. Consistently, with 24.3 and current trunk on xfce.
I'll have to trace the values passed to gtk_window_resize myself.
martin
- bug#16013: 24.3.50; Rows in height is interpreted as pixels., (continued)
- bug#16013: 24.3.50; Rows in height is interpreted as pixels., Jan Djärv, 2013/12/03
- bug#16013: 24.3.50; Rows in height is interpreted as pixels., martin rudalics, 2013/12/03
- bug#16013: 24.3.50; Rows in height is interpreted as pixels., Jan Djärv, 2013/12/03
- bug#16013: 24.3.50; Rows in height is interpreted as pixels., martin rudalics, 2013/12/03
- bug#16013: 24.3.50; Rows in height is interpreted as pixels., Jan Djärv, 2013/12/03
- bug#16013: 24.3.50; Rows in height is interpreted as pixels., Jan Djärv, 2013/12/03
- bug#16013: 24.3.50; Rows in height is interpreted as pixels., martin rudalics, 2013/12/04
- bug#16013: 24.3.50; Rows in height is interpreted as pixels., Jan Djärv, 2013/12/07
- bug#16013: 24.3.50; Rows in height is interpreted as pixels., martin rudalics, 2013/12/07
- bug#16013: 24.3.50; Rows in height is interpreted as pixels., martin rudalics, 2013/12/09
- bug#16013: 24.3.50; Rows in height is interpreted as pixels.,
martin rudalics <=