[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#16096: emacs_abort in bidi_initialize + 126 / Fselect_frame -- unipr
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#16096: emacs_abort in bidi_initialize + 126 / Fselect_frame -- uniprop_table returns NIL |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:28:32 +0200 |
> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 05:45:20 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Cc: 16096@debbugs.gnu.org, konrad.podczeck@univie.ac.at
>
> > From: David Reitter <david.reitter@gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 17:54:46 -0500
> > Cc: konrad podczeck <konrad.podczeck@univie.ac.at>
> >
> > Given the activity in bidi, I thought I'd forward this crash report.
> >
> > bidi_initialize+126 resolves as follows in this binary:
> >
> > (lldb) image lookup --address bidi_initialize+126
> > Address: Aquamacs[0x00000001000efa4e] (Aquamacs.__TEXT.__text +
> > 971166)
> > Summary: Aquamacs`bidi_initialize + 126 at bidi.c:766
> >
> > I.e., uniprop_table (intern ("mirroring")) seems to have returned NIL.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Is the problem still reproducible with the current trunk? If so, I'd
> need a recipe to work on this.
Actually, there's something else that is strange in this report:
The last merged change in bidi.c is
Author: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Date: Tue Sep 17 00:06:42 2013 -0700
Don't overuse 'const' in types of locals.
How come an Emacs built on Dec 9 has its last change in bidi.c in
September? Is this the development trunk or something else? If the
former, which bzr revision does it correspond to?