[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#16202: 24.3.50; lisp-mode's indent-sexp might be buggy (for slime in
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
bug#16202: 24.3.50; lisp-mode's indent-sexp might be buggy (for slime in particular, and lisp in general) |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Dec 2013 15:08:29 +0000 |
Hi maintainers,
This was started by bug reports in the slime-devel mailing list
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.slime.devel/11196
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.slime.devel/11189
The reproduction recipe described in these messages requires,
unfortunately, that you install slime.
However, I do think there is a slight bug on emacs's side (which is
probably not visible in emacs-lisp's testing rules). You see, the common
lisp loop macro likes its comments indented like (this is slime's test
nr 11).
(loop when foo
do (fubar)
and collect cash
else do ;; this is the body of the first else
;; the body is ...
(indented to the above comment)
(ZMACS gets this wrong)
do
when funny-predicate do ;; Here's a comment
(body filled to comment))
and sometimes indent-sexp insists on
(loop when foo
do (fubar)
and collect cash
else do ;; this is the body of the first else
;; the body is ...
(indented to the above comment)
(ZMACS gets this wrong)
do
when funny-predicate do ;; Here's a comment
(body filled to comment))
which indented the two comment lines to comment-column, I think. The
patch I attach at the end of this message fixes it.
...as does indenting the sexp with indent-region. This might be naive,
but why not super-simplify indent-sexp to be something like this?
(defun indent-sexp (&optional endpos)
(interactive)
(if endpos
(indent-region (point) endpos)
(indent-region (point) (save-excursion
(forward-sexp 1)
(point)))))
Thanks,
João
***
d:/joaot/Vendor/emacs-24.3.5-old/share/emacs/24.3.50/lisp/emacs-lisp/lisp-mode.el
--- #<buffer lisp-mode.el|emacs-24.3.5-old>
***************
*** 1578,1596 ****
;; unless a line ends inside a string.
(while (and (not inner-loop-done)
(not (setq outer-loop-done (eobp))))
(setq state (parse-partial-sexp (point) (progn (end-of-line) (point))
nil nil state))
(setq next-depth (car state))
! ;; If the line contains a comment other than the sort
! ;; that is indented like code,
! ;; indent it now with indent-for-comment.
! ;; Comments indented like code are right already.
! ;; In any case clear the in-comment flag in the state
! ;; because parse-partial-sexp never sees the newlines.
! (if (car (nthcdr 4 state))
! (progn (indent-for-comment)
! (end-of-line)
! (setcar (nthcdr 4 state) nil)))
;; If this line ends inside a string,
;; go straight to next line, remaining within the inner loop,
;; and turn off the \-flag.
--- 1578,1597 ----
;; unless a line ends inside a string.
(while (and (not inner-loop-done)
(not (setq outer-loop-done (eobp))))
+ (setq before-parse (point))
(setq state (parse-partial-sexp (point) (progn (end-of-line) (point))
nil nil state))
(setq next-depth (car state))
! ;; If the line contains nothing but a comment other than the sort that
! ;; is indented like code, indent it now with indent-for-comment.
! ;; Comments indented like code are right already. In any case clear
! ;; the in-comment flag in the state because parse-partial-sexp never
! ;; sees the newlines.
! (when (car (nthcdr 4 state))
! (when (<= (nth 8 state) before-parse)
! (indent-for-comment)
! (end-of-line))
! (setcar (nthcdr 4 state) nil))
;; If this line ends inside a string,
;; go straight to next line, remaining within the inner loop,
;; and turn off the \-flag.
Diff finished. Fri Dec 20 13:30:32 2013
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#16202: 24.3.50; lisp-mode's indent-sexp might be buggy (for slime in particular, and lisp in general),
João Távora <=