bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#16526: 24.3.50; scroll-conservatively & c-mode regression


From: martin rudalics
Subject: bug#16526: 24.3.50; scroll-conservatively & c-mode regression
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 12:19:15 +0100

>> IIUC `beginning-of-buffer' does set_point_both.  Does that move all the
>> way back to the beginning?
>
> Of course not, it jumps there in one go.
>
>>  > And yes, I know why: it's because scroll-conservatively causes
>>  > redisplay to examine buffer text around point,
>>
>> Where is `point' at that time?
>
> At EOB.

But if `beginning-of-buffer' jumps to BOB in one go how comes that
`point' at the time something "causes redisplay to examine buffer text
around point" is still at EOB?

>> But the `end-of-buffer' call terminates cleanly after a few seconds -
>> that's what the `sit-for' proves in my code.
>
> Right, and that's when redisplay kicks in, which invokes JIT Lock.

If I shorten my scenario to

(progn
  (setq scroll-conservatively 101)
  (find-file (concat source-directory "src/xdisp.c"))
  (end-of-buffer)
  (sit-for 3))

it terminates here in a few seconds.  When/where exactly does redisplay
kick in in the original scenario?

>>  > No, going to BOB is instantaneous.  The problem happens in redisplay
>>  > after going to EOB.
>>
>> EOB happens before my `sit-for'.
>
> See above.  Redisplay is separate from command execution.  So yes, we
> are already at EOB, and then redisplay happens.

And I see nothing bad happen until that redisplay finishes.

>>  >> And somehow a "current position" is still near the end of the buffer at
>>  >> that time.
>>  >
>>  > Yes, because Emacs is at EOB.
>>
>> Why?
>
> Because we moved there with end-of-buffer.

And then `beginning-of-buffer' moves `point' to `point-min' and the
trouble starts.  We probably are miscommunicating but please check once
more your claim that the problem is with redisplay after
`end-of-buffer'.  If I omit `beginning-of-buffer' from my code I can see
no problems.

martin





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]