[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#16603: 24.3.50; Segfault when viewing a backtrace
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#16603: 24.3.50; Segfault when viewing a backtrace |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Feb 2014 19:50:11 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> This has been fixed now.
Oops. No, it hasn't. Or... uhm... I got a backtrace once (so that's
fine), but then Emacs segfaulted.
So it's changed, but the problem is still there.
#0 mem_insert (start=start@entry=0x2089000, end=end@entry=0x20893e0,
type=type@entry=MEM_TYPE_CONS) at alloc.c:3850
#1 0x000000000052f5fe in lisp_align_malloc (nbytes=nbytes@entry=992,
type=type@entry=MEM_TYPE_CONS) at alloc.c:1134
#2 0x000000000052f80f in Fcons (car=car@entry=12217682, cdr=33946566)
at alloc.c:2461
#3 0x000000000059497c in add_properties (plist=plist@entry=33946518,
i=i@entry=0x1056618, object=object@entry=34019941, set_type=set_type@entry=
TEXT_PROPERTY_REPLACE) at textprop.c:471
#4 0x0000000000596501 in add_text_properties_1 (start=6432, end=6476,
properties=33946518, object=34019941, set_type=TEXT_PROPERTY_REPLACE)
at textprop.c:1276
#5 0x0000000000548e14 in Ffuncall (nargs=<optimized out>,
args=<optimized out>) at eval.c:2824
#6 0x000000000057c81d in exec_byte_code (bytestr=-6847441758440128512,
vector=34116576, maxdepth=2, args_template=61, nargs=140737488257904,
args=0x5) at bytecode.c:919
#7 0x000000000054890f in funcall_lambda (fun=9116093, nargs=nargs@entry=6,
arg_vector=arg_vector@entry=0x7ffffffe8550) at eval.c:3047
#8 0x0000000000548c6b in Ffuncall (nargs=7, args=0x7ffffffe8548)
at eval.c:2874
#9 0x000000000057c81d in exec_byte_code (bytestr=-6847441758440128512,
vector=34116576, maxdepth=2, args_template=61, nargs=19, args=0x7)
at bytecode.c:919
#10 0x000000000054890f in funcall_lambda (fun=34271429, nargs=nargs@entry=4,
arg_vector=arg_vector@entry=0x7ffffffe8780) at eval.c:3047
#11 0x0000000000548c6b in Ffuncall (nargs=5, args=0x7ffffffe8778)
at eval.c:2874
#12 0x000000000057c81d in exec_byte_code (bytestr=-6847441758440128512,
vector=34116576, maxdepth=2, args_template=61, nargs=140737488258928,
args=0x5) at bytecode.c:919
#13 0x00000000005489a7 in funcall_lambda (fun=31437373, nargs=nargs@entry=0,
arg_vector=0x7ffffffe89a0, arg_vector@entry=0x7ffffffe8918) at eval.c:2981
#14 0x0000000000548c6b in Ffuncall (nargs=1, args=0x7ffffffe8910)
at eval.c:2874
#15 0x000000000057c81d in exec_byte_code (bytestr=-6847441758440128512,
vector=34116576, maxdepth=2, args_template=61, nargs=140737488259344,
args=0x1) at bytecode.c:919
#16 0x00000000005489a7 in funcall_lambda (fun=31437037, nargs=nargs@entry=1,
arg_vector=0x7ffffffe8c40, arg_vector@entry=0x7ffffffe8b88) at eval.c:2981
#17 0x0000000000548c6b in Ffuncall (nargs=2, args=0x7ffffffe8b80)
at eval.c:2874
#18 0x000000000057c81d in exec_byte_code (bytestr=-6847441758440128512,
vector=34116576, maxdepth=2, args_template=61, nargs=140737488259960,
args=0x2) at bytecode.c:919
#19 0x00000000005489a7 in funcall_lambda (fun=31436661, nargs=nargs@entry=2,
arg_vector=0x7ffffffe8fb0, arg_vector@entry=0x7ffffffe8d28) at eval.c:2981
#20 0x0000000000548c6b in Ffuncall (nargs=nargs@entry=3,
args=args@entry=0x7ffffffe8d20) at eval.c:2874
#21 0x000000000054a05c in Fapply (nargs=nargs@entry=2,
args=args@entry=0x7ffffffe8dc0) at eval.c:2352
#22 0x000000000054a290 in apply1 (fn=12153762, arg=arg@entry=34361910)
at eval.c:2586
#23 0x000000000054a436 in call_debugger (arg=34361910) at eval.c:330
#24 0x00000000005493ad in maybe_call_debugger (data=34361958, sig=12081778,
conditions=8584158) at eval.c:1731
#25 Fsignal (error_symbol=12081778, data=34361958) at eval.c:1549
#26 0x0000000000549579 in xsignal (error_symbol=<optimized out>,
data=<optimized out>) at eval.c:1586
#27 0x0000000000549c44 in signal_error (
s=0x5de958 "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size", arg=12030258)
at eval.c:1641
#28 0x0000000000549cd2 in grow_specpdl () at eval.c:2030
#29 0x0000000000549dc6 in specbind (symbol=16201218, value=12030258)
at eval.c:3145
#30 0x000000000057c7e3 in exec_byte_code (bytestr=-6847441758440128512,
vector=34116576, maxdepth=2, args_template=61, nargs=140737488260888,
args=0x5) at bytecode.c:881
#31 0x000000000054890f in funcall_lambda (fun=31472749, nargs=nargs@entry=1,
etc
It's a very very deep backtrace.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
- bug#16603: 24.3.50; Segfault when viewing a backtrace, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2014/02/06
- bug#16603: 24.3.50; Segfault when viewing a backtrace,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- bug#16603: 24.3.50; Segfault when viewing a backtrace, Dmitry Antipov, 2014/02/07
- bug#16603: 24.3.50; Segfault when viewing a backtrace, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2014/02/07
- bug#16603: 24.3.50; Segfault when viewing a backtrace, Dmitry Antipov, 2014/02/10
- bug#16603: 24.3.50; Segfault when viewing a backtrace, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2014/02/10
- bug#16603: 24.3.50; Segfault when viewing a backtrace, Dmitry Antipov, 2014/02/10
- bug#16603: 24.3.50; Segfault when viewing a backtrace, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2014/02/10