bug#16810: 24.3.50; `with-eval-after-load'

[Juanma Barranquero]

Some brief comments.

>    The main difference I can see, based on the available doc, is that
>    the macro evaluates the BODY "*each time* LIBRARY is loaded".  Is
>    that considered "better behaved"?  Why?

Docstring for eval-after-load says:

  If a matching file is loaded again, form will be evaluated again.

so how is that different?

>    Other, obvious differences, which I can hardly imagine to constitute
>    "better" behavior and so call for introducing this macro, let alone
>    replacing `eval-after-load' with it, are (a) that it is a macro, so
>    you do not need to quote its arg

To me, that's a big difference which makes the macro much "better". YMMV.

> 2. The doc string is not helpful enough.

Agreed.