[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#16967: frame related race condition
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
bug#16967: frame related race condition |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Mar 2014 22:13:40 +0100 |
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:07 AM, martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> wrote:
> ... so I was doubting that you really agreed with my judgment of this
> bug.
It would be hard to deny that there are nasty bugs related to frames
and the Windows wm. So yes, I agree with your judgment.
> BTW: The more I look into this, the more I'm convinced that implementing
> frame parameters on top of the old frame infrastructure was one of the
> worst design ideas ever.
:-)
- bug#16967: frame related race condition, (continued)
- bug#16967: frame related race condition, martin rudalics, 2014/03/10
- bug#16967: frame related race condition, martin rudalics, 2014/03/10
- bug#16967: frame related race condition, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/03/10
- bug#16967: frame related race condition, martin rudalics, 2014/03/10
- bug#16967: frame related race condition, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/03/10
- bug#16967: frame related race condition, martin rudalics, 2014/03/10
- bug#16967: frame related race condition, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/03/10
- bug#16967: frame related race condition, martin rudalics, 2014/03/10
- bug#16967: frame related race condition, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/03/10
- bug#16967: frame related race condition, martin rudalics, 2014/03/11
- bug#16967: frame related race condition,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- bug#16967: frame related race condition, Stefan Monnier, 2014/03/12
- bug#16967: frame related race condition, martin rudalics, 2014/03/14
- bug#16967: frame related race condition, Stefan Monnier, 2014/03/14
- bug#16967: frame related race condition, Stefan Monnier, 2014/03/10
- bug#16967: frame related race condition, martin rudalics, 2014/03/11