|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | bug#17030: CEDET EDE documentation mentions android project, but not in tree |
Date: | Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:43:36 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 |
On 18.03.2014 10:19, David Engster wrote:
That doesn't work because there are not enough CEDET developers. Our resources are stretched thin with maintaining the stuff that is already in Emacs, so I'm not inclined to merge more, largely untested code which I myself don't use.
I see. But why not merge db-javap.el, at least? And maybe related code. Do you think Alex isn't going to support it?
whoever wants to maintain the Android project should make sure the head of the FSF is OK with it being in Emacs, and I can't imagine anyone eager to start that discussion...
I think CEDET really needs to move to ELPA. Even if Richard would object to distributing some code via GNU ELPA (but, as you can notice, company-clang is still there, for now), the additional features shouldn't be too hard to modularize and distribute separately.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |