bug#16694: bugs #16694/#16378: Patches

[Barry OReilly]

The last patch I indicated is my best guess safe patch that solves the --reverse-video symptom I care about. To summarize my rationale: an unconditional call to make-face-x-resource-internal was moved down into face-spec-recalc, but at least one other caller of face-spec-recalc clearly doesn't want an unconditional call to make-face-x-resource-internal. Moving the make-face-x-resource-internal call back up one call level to the caller which the offending patch touched thus seems right.

Matthias, in your patch, that same make-face-x-resource-internal call was moved to an earlier line in the same face-spec-recalc function, so it's not obvious how to reconcile your patch with mine. The concern I raised applies equally to your patch. Maybe you could give my patch a go to see if it has any effect on your ill symptom. If not, then perhaps you have an idea about reconciling the patches?