[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#17806: 24.4.50; Branch emacs-24 fails to beuild on Debian
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#17806: 24.4.50; Branch emacs-24 fails to beuild on Debian |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jun 2014 17:06:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> Why does Emacs even have --enable-link-time-optimization as a configure
>> option? Does it provide any measurable benefit?
> It's supposed to have better runtime performance. In my standard little
> benchmark, though, --enable-link-time-optimization slowed down runtime CPU
Don't know what benchmark you use, but I generally use byte-compilation
of Emacs's files as my own benchmark. It's kind of lousy (since it
constantly changes), but it is one real-life code where a lot of Elisp
is executed.
> I installed the attached as emacs-24 bzr 117269 to try to discourage casual
> use. Another possibility would be to
> remove --enable-link-time-optimization, but I suppose that should be done in
> the trunk if it's done at all. I'll CC: this to Dmitry as he added the
> option in the first place.
If it tends to break (and since IIUC it's new in 24.4), we could also
remove it from 24.4.
Stefan
- bug#17806: 24.4.50; Branch emacs-24 fails to beuild on Debian, (continued)
bug#17806: 24.4.50; Branch emacs-24 fails to beuild on Debian, Paul Eggert, 2014/06/20
bug#17806: 24.4.50; Branch emacs-24 fails to beuild on Debian, Glenn Morris, 2014/06/20
bug#17806: 24.4.50; Branch emacs-24 fails to beuild on Debian, Dmitry Antipov, 2014/06/20
bug#17806: 24.4.50; Branch emacs-24 fails to beuild on Debian, Glenn Morris, 2014/06/21
bug#17806: 24.4.50; Branch emacs-24 fails to beuild on Debian, Dmitry Antipov, 2014/06/24
bug#17806: 24.4.50; Branch emacs-24 fails to beuild on Debian, Paul Eggert, 2014/06/24
bug#17806: 24.4.50; Branch emacs-24 fails to beuild on Debian, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/24