bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#18566: 24.3.93 Unable to use a command such as dired which involves


From: Ken Brown
Subject: bug#18566: 24.3.93 Unable to use a command such as dired which involves forking a process
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 18:58:35 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0



On 9/26/2014 6:12 PM, Jim Hurt wrote:
On 9/26/2014 2:52 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 9/26/2014 1:50 PM, Jim Hurt wrote:

Starting today (2014/09/26) when I issue a command that needs to fork a
process such as dired I get the message in the terminal window:
       0 [main] emacs-w32 816 child_info_fork::abort:
C:\cygwin\bin\cygharfbuzz-0.dll: Loaded to different address:
parent(0x340000) != child(0xF80000)

This usually means you need to run rebaseall.  See

https://www.cygwin.com/faq.html#faq.using.fixing-fork-failures

I am running Windows 8.1 using cygwin and
GNU Emacs 24.3.93.1 (i686-pc-cygwin) of 2014-08-15 on fiona

Ken


When I do this, I get:

$ /bin/rebaseall
/usr/lib/perl5/5.14/i686-cygwin-threads-64int/CORE/cygperl5_14_2.dll:
skipped because nonexistent.
/usr/x86_64-pc-cygwin/sys-root/usr/bin/cygcrypto-1.0.0.dll: skipped
because wrong machine type.
/usr/x86_64-pc-cygwin/sys-root/usr/bin/cygssh2-1.dll: skipped because
wrong machine type.
/usr/x86_64-pc-cygwin/sys-root/usr/bin/cygssl-1.0.0.dll: skipped because
wrong machine type.
/usr/x86_64-pc-cygwin/sys-root/usr/bin/cygz.dll: skipped because wrong
machine type.

These are harmless warnings.

and my emacs behavior is even worse.

Then you should follow up on the Cygwin list. I'm pretty sure this is a Cygwin issue and not an Emacs bug. When you do follow up, please attach cygcheck output as requested at http://cygwin.com/problems.html, and please give the simplest possible recipe for reproducing the problem (starting from "emacs -Q"). Also, it might be useful for you to compress and attach the output of "rebase -is"; the address at which cygharfbuzz-0.dll is loaded looks surprisingly low to me. This makes me think of another thing you could try: Move the rebase database /etc/rebase.db.i386 out of the way and then rerun rebaseall.

Ken






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]