[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038
From: |
Gabriel |
Subject: |
bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038 |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Dec 2014 19:33:39 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.51 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> I understand your decision -- but if this is the only reason people
> are still using 32-bit systems, we can just let them disappear.
Indeed.
> I wonder if a Glibc upgrade could fix this for you, as someone
> suggested.
Maybe, however, I'll think I'll just try and go for a 64-bit system when
I'll have the time.
Which should just be easier.
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, (continued)
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Andreas Schwab, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Gabriel, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/11
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038,
Gabriel <=
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/11
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/11
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/12