|
From: | martin rudalics |
Subject: | bug#20189: 25.0.50; Feature request: Alternative split-window-sensibly functions |
Date: | Thu, 26 Mar 2015 17:04:26 +0100 |
> Yes, I probably don't. But I like reusing the current window even > lesser which would happen when returning just nil. I also don't want > another split which would happen when I defer to > `split-window-sensibly'. So what else can I do? Earlier you said that you wanted a behavior like. > +--------------------+--------------------+-----------------+ > | | | | > | | | | > | | | | > | | | | > | | | | > | | | | > | | | | > | | | | > | | | | > | | | | > | | | (TWO) | > | | | (THREE) | > | *scratch* | ONE | FOUR | > +--------------------+--------------------+-----------------+ so even if TWO's window were selected you wanted to show THREE in that window. Have you tried the `th/display-buffer' I sent you earlier? It should always use the right-/bottommost window after deciding not to split. If you want a different behavior you'd have to tell me what you want instead. martin
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |