[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#20211: 24.4; sendmail.el
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#20211: 24.4; sendmail.el |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:20:14 +0200 |
> Does the following look sensible to you?
Yes, thanks. Two minor nitpicks: I'd put a newline after
(if error
and use `buffer-live-p' instead of `bufferp'. Though it's not likely
someone might have killed errbuf in between and we want to avoid a
confusing error message in that case. And please provide a suitable
ChangeLog entry.
> Should we endeavor
> to confirm good behavior when mail-interactive is true and the
> sendmail program fails?
I'm not sure I understand you here. IIUC "when mail-interactive is true
and the sendmail program fails" we show the error. Don't we?
martin