|
From: | Paul Eggert |
Subject: | bug#20325: convert "fixes:debbugs:123" in log to (Bug#123) in ChangeLog |
Date: | Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:02:51 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 |
Dmitry Gutov wrote:
We've used the debbugs:1234 format in commit messages for a while now.
We've used several formats. "Fixes: debbugs:NNNN" is designed for Bzr I think, "(Bug#NNNN)" is the more-traditional form, and CONTRIBUTE currently recommends a third format "Fixes: bug#NNNN".
In practice, about as many commits these days use the Bzr-ish format as use the more-traditional form (see (*) below). I don't know why we're still using a Bzr-ish format (is it just inertia?), and I don't know why CONTRIBUTE disagrees with both the commonly-used formats.
Since we're not using Bzr any more, how about if we change CONTRIBUTE to suggest the more-traditional "(Bug#NNNN)" form? Any new technology that replaces debbugs would have to handle the same bug numbers as before, I expect.
(*) I surveyed the 2213 commits since November 1 (this is a bit before the Git transition), i.e., all commits from d87931d249a4c7f15d4c1178c6ce396ab18ce1f6 through 35be45bbc9ac525bb2bc3e20b0fa27c1ceee0c15, and found the following number of instances of each format:
count example of the style 262 Fixes: debbugs:20357 172 (Bug#20011) 49 (bug#20276) 24 Fixes: bug#20338 8 Fix bug#19891 6 Fixes: Bug#20338 5 Fixes: 18757 5 Fixes Bug#15880. 2 Fixes: debbugs:19387 debbugs:19405 1 Fixes: debbugs:19134. 1 Fixes: big#19528 1 Fixes (bug#17284). 1 Fix Bug#20249
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |