bug#20440: 24.4; memory corruption

[Stefan Monnier]

> There are exactly the same length
> In 2 tests it happened 2 times.  So probably is reproducible.

If you can come up with a reproducible recipe, then please do so.


        Stefan


> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> wrote:

>> > after-change-functions is a variable defined in `C source code'.
>> > Its value is (jit-lock-after-change jedi:after-change-handler t)
>> > Local in buffer test_unframed.py; global value is nil
>> 
>> Hmm... could it be that jedi:after-change-handler does something funny?
>> Tho it seems rather unlikely: when it gets run, the revert has
>> already happened!
>> 
>> > I have captured a corrupt buffer.  This time, emacs said 'file has
>> changed,
>> > reload?'.  Again it is corrupted.
>> > The 1st diff is that in the corrupted file, the beginning of the file is
>> > inserted into the middle of the buffer
>> 
>> Normally revert compares the buffer's content and the file's content
>> (from both ends) to find the common "prefix" and "suffix" and only
>> performs the update on the characters in-between.  IOW the beginning of
>> the buffer/file is not touched and the end is not touched either.
>> 
>> So rather than "the beginning of the file is inserted into the middle of
>> the buffer" it sounds like the "characters in-between" end up being
>> inserted at the beginning of the buffer.
>> 
>> Was the region active when the revert happened?
>> 
>> Is the total size of the corrupted file correct? (i.e. the update was
>> just not inserted at the right place)
>> 
>> What can you say about the "splice points" (i.e. those positions in the
>> file where the corruption happens: IIUC there's one at the very
>> beginning, but where are the others (e.g. where is the "real
>> beginning", in the corrupted file))?
>> 
>> How frequently does it happen?  (i.e. would you be able to notice if it
>> doesn't happen any more, after we disable some feature)
>> 
>> 
>> Stefan
>> 
>> 
>> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Stefan Monnier <
>> monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
>> > wrote:
>> 
>> >> > I have seen (again this morning) I wind up with a corrupted buffer.
>> >> > It appears a segment of the data is correct, but data has been
>> >> > reordered.  I'm looking at a python source file.  For example, in the
>> >> > middle of the buffer, it looks like the beginning of the file is
>> >> > inserted (sorry I no longer have this buffer and can't be precise).
>> >>
>> >> Next time it happens, could you save the corrupted buffer to some temp
>> >> file, and then compare that with the actual file's content, to get
>> >> a more precise description of the corruption?
>> >>
>> >> You say it's a Python file.  What modes/packages do you use to edit
>> >> those files?  What does `M-: after-change-functions' and `M-:
>> >> before-change-functions' say in those buffers?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Stefan
>> >>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> > --
>> > *Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it*
>> 



> -- 
> *Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it*