bug#20843: 24.5; Profiler error: "Invalid sampling interval"

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:04:50 -0400
> From: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>
> CC: sva-news@mygooglest.com, 20843@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > Looks fine, but perhaps it would be cleaner to return the actual
> > message string or some distinctive code from setup_cpu_timer.  This
> > would avoid the need for a global variable.
> 
> Is this better?

Yes, thanks.