bug#21175: 24.5; progmodes/etags.el: next-file does (find-file next novisit)

[Dmitry Gutov]

Version: 25.1

On 08/01/2015 12:53 PM, phs wrote:

> Passing novisit is dangerous since find-file takes this as the wildcards
> flag, nothing to do with the meaning of novisit. Actually, if the
> filename contains * or ? (and is currently visited, or "not new") tags
> may create many buffers visiting many files that match the filename
> interpreted as a pattern, not an actual file name. What buffer will be
> searched next is maybe not the one associated with filename.

Thanks, this is fixed now as well.

> The comment too is incorrect.

I think the comment refers to the code below it.