[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#21422: 25.0.50; apropos-library on libraries using cl-def{generic,me
From: |
Mark Oteiza |
Subject: |
bug#21422: 25.0.50; apropos-library on libraries using cl-def{generic,method} fails |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Sep 2015 00:58:59 -0400 |
>From emacs -Q:
M-x apropos-library RET cl-generic RET
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument symbolp
(cl-generic-generalizers (head eql)))
apropos-symbols-internal((cl--generic-typeof-generalizer
cl--generic-typeof-types cl--generic-struct-generalizer
cl--generic-struct-specializers cl--generic$
apropos-library("cl-generic")
funcall-interactively(apropos-library "cl-generic")
call-interactively(apropos-library record nil)
command-execute(apropos-library record)
execute-extended-command(nil "apropos-library" nil)
funcall-interactively(execute-extended-command nil "apropos-library" nil)
call-interactively(execute-extended-command nil nil)
command-execute(execute-extended-command)
I came across this because doing M-. on a function defined with
cl-defgeneric and cl-defmethod doesn't go to the definition, just the
top of the library, so apropos-library was my backup. I don't know if
the xref behavior should be a separate report.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#21422: 25.0.50; apropos-library on libraries using cl-def{generic,method} fails,
Mark Oteiza <=