[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:45:53 +0300 |
> From: Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org>
> Cc: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, storm@cua.dk,
> 21747@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 14:13:54 +0200
>
> Actually, the `post-command-hook' function in question
> (aggressive-indent--indent-if-changed) is not so overly expensive. At
> least I have validated that it has finished running I type the next key,
> thus the abort-on-input case doesn't even occur.
>
> My recipe for reproduction is
>
> 1. emacs -Q
> 2. M-x package-initialize
> 3. M-x global-aggressive-indent-mode
> 4. C-x C-f ~/test.sh
> 5. type the keyword if where the i is displayed immediately
> and the display of f is delayed
>
> This does only occur for sh-mode keywords like if, while, etc. where the
> delaying starts with after entering the last char of the keyword. Also,
> I can reproduce that problem only if test.sh doesn't exist.
I don't understand: are you saying that the post-command-hook finished
its job, and yet redisplay is not entered?
> Or well, I just tried what happens when I replace the `while-no-input'
> with a `progn'. Then Emacs goes into some infloop. Attaching with gdb
> shows:
There's a procedure in etc/DEBUG to determine which call-stack frame
infloops, please use it and tell what you found.
Thanks.
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/24
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/24
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/24
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Artur Malabarba, 2015/10/24
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/24
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/24
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Artur Malabarba, 2015/10/24
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/25
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/25
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/25
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/25
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/25
- bug#21747: 25.0.50; while-no-input breaks kbd event handling when called from post-command-hook, Stefan Monnier, 2015/10/25