bug#22043: 25.0.50; search-forward and char folding

[Artur Malabarba]

On 29 Nov 2015 8:41 pm, "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com> wrote:
> Perhaps, to be more precise, the difference is search that
> does or does not accept general regexp patterns as _input_.
> Those that do have "regexp" (or "-re-"?) in their name;
> those that do not do not have it.  The former do not
> support char folding; the latter do.  Is that correct (and
> complete)?
>
> I guess I was mistaken in thinking that non-incremental
> search commands, such as `nonincremental-search-forward',
> do not support char folding (regardless of whether they
> include "-re" in their name).  Which ones support it, and
> under what circumstances?

All of the nonincremental-*search-* support folding (except those that use regexp).

In general, you're correct that most non-regexp searches do char folding. But that's most, not all. A plain `search-forward' doesn't do folding (by choice). So we can't just document that "all non regexp searches do folding".