bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#20032: eww: access bookmarks right from the URI prompt


From: Ivan Shmakov
Subject: bug#20032: eww: access bookmarks right from the URI prompt
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 16:48:35 +0000
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)

>>>>> Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>>>>> Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> writes:

 >>> It would be OK to have that as the first entry in the `M-n'
 >>> history, but not as the default.  If I read the code correctly.

 >> I guess that could be fixed by using a modified version of
 >> read-string and flagging the values returned by
 >> eww-suggest-bookmarks in such a way as to never be considered as the
 >> default by that function.  I doubt that that’s worth the effort,
 >> however.  (Unless such a function already exists.)

 > `read-string' with nil initial-input and default-value will have no
 > defaults.

        So?  I don’t see how this is supposed to help in this case.

 >> What bothers me more is that the sheer corpus of contemporary
 >> software will generally filter the list of bookmarks per the search
 >> terms typed in by the user first, and only then present the result
 >> for their respective equivalents of M-n.  Which gets handy if your
 >> bookmarks (or history, or pretty much anything of that kind) number
 >> in the hundreds (or more.)  I know of no similar facility in the
 >> current Emacs, however.

 > Yeah, just sticking the bookmarks in the history isn't very useful.

        Having used this feature ever since I’ve got it implemented,
        I tend to disagree.

 > Message uses ecomplete to do "electric" completion.

        AIUI, it currently allows for only a single completion table,
        and I doubt that it will make much sense to have that table
        shared among Message and EWW (and perhaps other possible users.)

-- 
FSF associate member #7257  http://am-1.org/~ivan/      … 3013 B6A0 230E 334A





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]