bug#22692: 25.0.91; xref-find-definitions fails to prompt

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Cc: 22692@debbugs.gnu.org, m.kupfer@acm.org
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:08:37 +0200
> 
> On 02/19/2016 05:59 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > It is a valid use case to try to find out whether a symbol already has
> > some definition.  In that case, saying "no definition" is what the
> > user will expect for an undefined symbol, so asking for a symbol will
> > confuse.
> 
> Then we don't need to change anything there, do we?

Yes, I think so.

> >> We probably should just remove the word "valid" from there.
> >
> > That depends on how you will change the behavior ;-)
> 
> Zero change is best change. :-)

No, I meant the change you wanted to make in finding the symbol at
point, to avoid looking for it anywhere on the same line.