[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#22884: 25.0.92; C/l mode editing takes waaaayy too long
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
bug#22884: 25.0.92; C/l mode editing takes waaaayy too long |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Mar 2016 23:18:23 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
Hello, Eli.
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 10:40:42PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 12:49:10 +0000
> > From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
> > Cc: 22884@debbugs.gnu.org
> > > emacs -Q config.h
> > > M-x goto-line RET 1661 RET / /
> > > On my six-year-old desktop the second '/' takes about 10 seconds to
> > > echo. This sort of thing makes Emacs effectively unusable for editing
> > > config.h.
> > The problem is in config.h. At line 14, inside a comment, appears the
> > following string:
> > "(at your option) any later version."
> > . The open paren is at column zero, so the fancy code in syntax.c then
> > fails to recognise the comment as a comment.
> I think we should change syntax.c to fix this. (Alternatively, CC
> mode could stop depending on it, but I doubt this is a viable
> alternative.) We cannot really tell people we don't support such
> files, as they are valid C code.
Would it be practicable to mark comments with text properties? Say, a
property called `comment-depth' which would be either nil (meaning
currently unknown), 0 (definitely not in a comment), 1 (definitely in a
comment), 2 (in a nested comment), 3, ...... ? That way we could always
scan comments in the forwards direction (which is easy) - if we need to
go backwards over a comment without the property, we can just go back to
a known point and scan forward.
Or would this just overwhelm the text property mechanism?
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
bug#22884: 25.0.92; C/l mode editing takes waaaayy too long, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/03
bug#22884: 25.0.92; C/l mode editing takes waaaayy too long, Stefan Monnier, 2016/03/14