[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#22947: 25.0.92; xref-find-definitions fails for Perl & etags
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#22947: 25.0.92; xref-find-definitions fails for Perl & etags |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:16:14 +0200 |
> Cc: 22947@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 15:36:58 +0200
>
> So we need to generate unqualified tag names, in addition to (or simply
> instead of) the qualified ones like the above.
So which one is better: both unqualified and qualified, or just
unqualified?
What symbol does xref pick up in a Perl buffer, when we have a
qualified name at point?
- bug#22947: 25.0.92; xref-find-definitions fails for Perl & etags, Bob Rogers, 2016/03/08
- bug#22947: 25.0.92; xref-find-definitions fails for Perl & etags, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/03/08
- bug#22947: 25.0.92; xref-find-definitions fails for Perl & etags, Bob Rogers, 2016/03/08
- bug#22947: 25.0.92; xref-find-definitions fails for Perl & etags, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/10
- bug#22947: 25.0.92; xref-find-definitions fails for Perl & etags, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/03/10
- bug#22947: 25.0.92; xref-find-definitions fails for Perl & etags, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/10
- bug#22947: 25.0.92; xref-find-definitions fails for Perl & etags, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/03/10
- bug#22947: 25.0.92; xref-find-definitions fails for Perl & etags, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/11
- bug#22947: 25.0.92; xref-find-definitions fails for Perl & etags, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/03/11
- bug#22947: 25.0.92; xref-find-definitions fails for Perl & etags, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/11
- bug#22947: 25.0.92; xref-find-definitions fails for Perl & etags, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/03/11
- bug#22947: 25.0.92; xref-find-definitions fails for Perl & etags, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/12