[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:52:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
[snip]
> So on to the specific problem of `M-q' again: If we think the general
> solution is a no go, would it still make sense to do the hash-the-buffer
> solution just for `M-q'? That is, does `M-q' ever change text
> properties in a way that we want maintained without changing the text
> itself? I think the answer to the last question is "no", but I'm not
> sure.
To be precise, the question is not about *maintaining* the changed
properties (nobody suggested to throw them away) but about marking the
buffer as modified just because those properties [might have] changed.
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, (continued)
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/27
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/28
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/28
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/28
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/28
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/28
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/28
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/28
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/28
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/28
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/28
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/28
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/28
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/28
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/28
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/28
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Andreas Röhler, 2016/03/28
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/03/27
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/03/27
- bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/03/27