bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
>> Cc: 13949@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:29:21 +0200
>> 
>> So I could just commit the changes I've got here (the new `hash-buffer'
>> function and the `M-q' changes, along with unit tests and doc fixes),
>> and then we can see how this feels and whether there are any gotchas.
>> 
>> And then ponder the more general issues later.
>> 
>> Does that sound OK to everybody?
>
> As optional behavior, yes.

With a variable to switch it off or on?  I'm not quite sure I see the
need, but I'm not against that...

> (Plus documentation, please.)

Of course.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no