bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> With a variable to switch it off or on?
>
> Yes, I think that'd be good enough.
>
>> I'm not quite sure I see the need, but I'm not against that...
>
> You've heard here that some people think the current behavior is
> correct, so we should expect users to ask "how do I get the old
> behavior back?"  We should have an answer for that.

Oh, I think I missed that.  I thought they were only being confused
about how cryptographic hashes worked?  There were somebody who really
wanted the "`M-q' didn't change anything, but I still want Emacs to say
that the buffer was changed" behaviour back?

In that case, I can add a variable for sure, but is that really the
case?  :-)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no