|
From: | Alexis |
Subject: | bug#23292: 24.5; Combining characters do not reliably combine |
Date: | Fri, 15 Apr 2016 19:03:15 +1000 |
User-agent: | mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.3 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
From: Alexis <flexibeast@gmail.com> Cc: hdfssk@gmail.com, 23292@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:17:48 +1000Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes: > No. Type 'o', then "C-x 8 RET 337".Done. i get the same result as the OP - i.e. the 'o' and the '/' are visually separated - using both DejaVu Sans Mono (Book) and Inconsolata-G (my default font).
My apologies, i accidentally used a non -Q instance to test this. :-/ In a -Q instance, it turns out that DejaVu Sans Mono (Book) /does/ compose visually:
Composed with the following character(s) "̷" using this font: xft:-unknown-DejaVu Sans Mono-normal-normal-normal-*-13-*-*-*-m-0-iso10646-1 by these glyphs: [0 1 111 82 8 0 8 8 1 nil] [0 1 823 703 0 0 8 8 1 [-8 0 0]]
Sorry! However, Inconsolata-g definitely doesn't compose visually.Interestingly, when i use `describe-char' on the 'o', i'm told that the glyph is sourced from Inconsolata-g, but when i use it on the '/', it tells me it's sourced from Gentium ....
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |