[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#2291: 23.0.90; finder-commentary
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#2291: 23.0.90; finder-commentary |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Apr 2016 11:05:16 -0700 (PDT) |
> >> Wouldn't it make more sense just to use the *Help* buffer? It has a
> >> nice history and stuff...
> >
> > No, certainly not. It should be commentary-specific, and file-specific,
> > as described in the bug report.
>
> It would be unusual. Most of these help-ish commands reuse the same
> buffer, and if you want to keep several of them around, you just rename
> the buffer yourself.
>
> So I don't think there's anything more to be done on this report.
This is nuts. `finder-commentary' is file-specific. Anyone
who uses it (and admittedly it is underused - most users know
nothing about its existence) uses it on multiple files.
You might have noticed recently a bunch of mails about having
multiple grep buffers etc. Well this is even more important
than that - and simpler, as this is just file-specific. Each
file should get its own finder-commentary buffer, named after it.