bug#10872: bug#10875: 24.0.93; `where-is-internal' and command remapping

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

"Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:

> No one has ever responded to this bug.  It was merged with 10872 for some
> reason, and that bug was supposedly fixed.
>
> But that was a DOC bug and this is a product BEHAVIOR bug.  I do not see
> anything fixed for this bug: `where-is-internal' still returns the wrong 
> result.

This is what Chong added:

The optional 5th arg NO-REMAP alters how command remapping is handled:

- If another command OTHER-COMMAND is remapped to DEFINITION, normally
  search for the bindings of OTHER-COMMAND and include them in the
  returned list.  But if NO-REMAP is non-nil, include the vector
  [remap OTHER-COMMAND] in the returned list instead, without
  searching for those other bindings.

- If DEFINITION is remapped to OTHER-COMMAND, normally return the
  bindings for OTHER-COMMAND.  But if NO-REMAP is non-nil, return the
  bindings for DEFINITION instead, ignoring its remapping.  */)

I'm not sure I understand what you're saying about `where-is-internal'.
Do you have a test case that displays that it's doing something other
then what is documented?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no