[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#23394: generate-new-buffer-name behaviour changed
|
From: |
Glenn Morris |
|
Subject: |
bug#23394: generate-new-buffer-name behaviour changed |
|
Date: |
Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:46:43 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Chaitanya Koparkar wrote:
> Steps to reproduce:
> * Start emacs and open a buffer named "*scratch*"
> * Run `(generate-new-buffer-name "*scratch*")`
> * The expected return value is "*scratch*<2>" but instead it returns
> "*scratch*<1>"
> I'm guessing, this commit introduced it,
> https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/commit/b4c7869e5e1bb0bb33379b25ff830e721761a7bf.
> Note the `++count` vs just `count`.
Looks to me like you are right.
generate-new-buffer-name is documented to start from <2>, not <1>.
Paul, please could you take a look?