[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline |
Date: |
Wed, 04 May 2016 19:51:36 +0300 |
> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 09:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, 23426@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > Maintaining too many alternative UIs is a maintenance burden we cannot
> > afford.
>
> Even if you left the existing `A' and `Q' code dormant, there
> would likely be little noticeable problem. At least for a few
> years, while letting users experiment with the new.
>
> Seriously, how much change has been needed recently for the
> existing `A' and `Q' code? Code which you are anyway not
> removing immediately.
Asked and answered already.
> The question I raised is only about the key bindings.
We cannot move to a new UI without moving the key bindings, so your
suggestion is at best impractical.
> Can you show where I claimed ill will on anyone's part in making
> this change?
All over.
> I'm sure the intentions were good ones.
We all know what happens with good intentions.
> As I said earlier, if the key bindings had not been taken over,
> I would likely have said nothing at all about this new feature.
It's not _what_ you say, it's _how_ you say it.
> The maintenance burden of the existing `A' and `Q' code?
The maintenance burden of the tags-loop-continue UI.
> You're not removing it immediately anyway. Why the need to
> take over those keys immediately?
As a first significant step towards removing it.
- bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline, (continued)
- bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline, Drew Adams, 2016/05/03
- bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/05/03
- bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline, Drew Adams, 2016/05/04
- bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/05/04
- bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline, Drew Adams, 2016/05/04
- bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/05/04
- bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline, Drew Adams, 2016/05/04
- bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/05/04
- bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/05/04
- bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline, Drew Adams, 2016/05/04
- bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline,
Eli Zaretskii <=
bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline, Kaushal Modi, 2016/05/04
bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/05/04
bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline, Drew Adams, 2016/05/04
bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/05/04
bug#23426: 25.0.93; dired-do-find-regexp doesn't find newline, Drew Adams, 2016/05/04