[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp |
Date: |
Sat, 07 May 2016 05:47:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.13; emacs 25.1.50.9 |
On 2016-05-06, at 14:59, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
>> Cc: rfflrccrd@gmail.com, 21072@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 14:27:49 +0200
>>
>> (defun spam ()
>> (spam))
>>
>> ;; Lorem ipsum
>> (defun lorem-ipsum ()
>> "Lorem ipsum."
>> (message "Lorem ipsum."))
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> How do I place point so that `mark-defun' would mark `lorem-ipsum'
>> together with the comment before?
>
> I'm sorry, I no longer remember. It's hard to communicate when days
> pass between messages.
I'm really sorry, but for me the asynchronicity of email and the
possibility of responding after a few days/weeks instead of a few
minutes is one of the main advantages of email as such (as opposed to
"tools" like Facebook, which I consider more of "toys", also because of
the difficulty to spread the conversation to weeks). I can only spend
that much time on Emacs bugs each day - similarly with other things -
and I often respond after long time (especially if the response needs
some time/effort to compose).
I'm not sure what to do next with this bug. I tried with the
abovementioned short Elisp file and failed. Since no-one said that the
current behavior is wrong, maybe I'll try to study the code of
`mark-defun' and modify the docstring/manual accordingly.
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/05/01
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/05/01
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/05/01
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/05/01
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/05/01
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/05/03
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/05/04
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/05/06
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/05/06
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp,
Marcin Borkowski <=
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Drew Adams, 2016/05/07
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/05/07