|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | bug#23465: 25.0.93; `lambda' after hash-quote not highlighted as keyword |
Date: | Wed, 11 May 2016 01:09:50 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1 |
On 05/10/2016 07:25 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Sorry, I don't know anything about that code, and don't consider myself an expert on font-lock enough to judge this suggestion. I hope someone else will chime in.
FWIW, LGTM.But should we encourage this use of sharp quotes? There is no need to quote lambdas; sharp quote doesn't hurt, but is there a case where it would help with a lambda?
As an aside, it would be great if we could get rid of the duplication between lisp--el-non-funcall-position-p vs elisp--form-quoted-p, elisp--expect-function-p and some bits inside elisp-completion-at-point. Or reduce it, at least.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |