bug#19548: VC changes under-documented, needlessly incompatible

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 02:42:09 +0300
> Cc: "Eric S. Raymond" <esr@thyrsus.com>
> 
> Looking at the commit that made this (185320a5), I see no reason for 
> there to be vc-stay-local. Quite the opposite, the commit message says:
> 
> "The CVS back end retaiin this machibery and the vc-stay-local 
> configuration variable now only affects it."
> 
> Why don't we remove vc-stay-local instead, and keep the appropriately 
> named vc-cvs-stay-local?

Will that also fix the typos in the log message? ;-)

Anyway, I tend to agree to go back to vc-cvs-stay-local.