bug#14518: C and Emacs Lisp code parts

[Andreas Röhler]

On 07.07.2016 00:36, John Wiegley wrote:
> > > > > > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> > > IMO we should simply say: no, abbrevs will not move back to C.
> > We probably will. But the data presented by Andreas is strange, and I think
> > warrants at least a bit looking into. Who knows what we will find?
> Agreed.  Andreas' problems may not even be a problem with abbrevs at all, but
> I'd very much like to know what is going on.
>
> Andreas, your .abbrev file doesn't live on an NFS mount or something crazy,
> does it? :)

Hi all,

nice seeing you disposed to query alternatives too, really appreciate that.

IMHO in the case given the reasons are pretty simple. See for example in

'prepare-abbrev-list-buffer':
...
      (dolist (table abbrev-table-name-list)

Such happens not only there. With the number of active modes/tables it 
growths - maybe exponentially?

Also: why define-abbrevs must process the whole buffer? Why not deal 
with just the changed parts?
Seems no hubble needed so far ;)

Cheers,

Andreas