bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#24057: 25.1.50; ffap interprets comments beginning with "//" as file


From: Kaushal Modi
Subject: bug#24057: 25.1.50; ffap interprets comments beginning with "//" as file path
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 11:56:40 +0000

On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:34 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
I see no reason to assume that file names cannot appear in comments.
 
I have already tested with these use cases and now it seems to do-the-right-thing:

In the below table, 'x' represents the point (the cursor would be on the character to its right).
The second column shows the value that ffap-string-at-point is set to on doing C-x C-f (with the ido setup explained in the first email).


|-----------------------------------+---------------------------------|
| Example string in `c-mode' buffer | Returned `ffap-string-at-point' |
|-----------------------------------+---------------------------------|
| x//tmp                            | "tmp"                           |
| //xtmp                            | "tmp"                           |
| x////tmp                          | "tmp"                           |
| ////xtmp                          | "tmp"                           |
| x// //tmp                         | ""                              |
| // //xtmp                         | "//tmp"                         |
|-----------------------------------+---------------------------------|


To try this out, paste the below in a new buffer and M-x c-mode.

//tmp
////tmp
// //tmp

Now do C-x C-f with cursor at those 6 different points and you will see that an attempt to read /tmp happens only in the case of "// //tmp" when the point is anywhere in the "//tmp" portion following "// ".


I could agree with a user option to disable this behavior, but
disabling it unconditionally is IMO a mistake.

Of course, if this patch returns in unintended ffap-string-at-point, I will add a defcustom to enable this behavior. 
--

Kaushal Modi


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]