bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#20208: 25.0.50; c-mode: incorrect fontification of simple enums (aga


From: Alex
Subject: bug#20208: 25.0.50; c-mode: incorrect fontification of simple enums (again)
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 17:51:14 -0600
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)

close 20208 25.1
quit

Dima Kogan <dima@secretsauce.net> writes:

> Hi. This is very similar to bug 19669. I'm running emacs from revision
> 6e1fac9, which has the fix to bug 19969: revision d69e9f1c.
>
> I'm opening a file tst.hh (attached). Then "emacs -Q -nw tst.hh". Then
> any interactive command (M-x, for instance). The result has
> fontification issues, as shown by the attached image.
>
>
> enum class error_t
> {
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                     
>   = -1,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                               
>           = -3,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx             = -4,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                       = -5,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                               
>           = -9,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                              
>           = -10,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                           = -11,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                                 
>           = -14,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                        = -15,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                      
>   = -16,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx = -18,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                      
>   = -19,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                            = -20,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                            = -21,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                          
>   = -22,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                            
>   = -25,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                       = -27,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                       = -31,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                            = -32,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                         
>   = -33,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                           
>   = -36,
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                          
>   = -48,
> };

This appears to have been fixed in 25.1.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]