[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-mayb
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:57:43 +0300 |
> From: Alex <agrambot@gmail.com>
> Cc: 24766@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:27:43 -0600
>
> > I'd prefer a backward-compatible change, i.e. make the new argument be
> > the 2nd one, and keep the current behavior when the 1st arg is non-nil
> > and the 2nd is nil or omitted.
>
> That's what I did, but I used a new name for the old argument and the
> old name for the new argument. I did so as the old name fits the new
> behaviour more.
>
> This is a backward-compatible change for indent-relative, but it does
> use the new behaviour for indent-relative-maybe. Is that alright with
> you?
Yes, thanks.
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Alex, 2016/10/22
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/22
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Alex, 2016/10/22
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/22
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Alex, 2016/10/22
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/23
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Alex, 2016/10/23
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/24
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe, Alex, 2016/10/24
- bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe,
Eli Zaretskii <=