bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe

[Alex]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> Thanks, this is fine, except that the new function's name should be
> better as indent-relative-first-indent-point or somesuch.

That name does better describe how (indent-relative t) works, but I
figured that indent-relative-whitespace is a better name for what people
seem to use it for (indent according to the whitespace on the previous
nonblank line).

Though if you still disagree then `indent-relative-first-indent-point'
seems fine (if not a bit long).

I suppose this diff goes over the accepted limit for non-assigned
submissions? I mailed my copyright forms about a month ago but
unfortunately the FSF hasn't informed me that the process is complete
yet.

indent4.diff
Description: 4th time