|
| From: | Dmitry Gutov |
| Subject: | bug#21391: 24.5; `thing-at-point' should return a string |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Nov 2016 20:55:44 +0200 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:50.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/50.0 |
On 10.11.2016 20:49, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
If the consumer needs the text representation, they will call (thing-at-point 'foo) If they need the "real thing", they will call (foo-at-point) which we really expect to be defined.Which is again entirely backward incompatible, right?
Why do you think so? This is the normal usage of thingatpt.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |