[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24953: 25.1; Possible inefficiency in UTF-8
From: |
Eli Barzilay |
Subject: |
bug#24953: 25.1; Possible inefficiency in UTF-8 |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:59:58 -0500 |
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Eli Barzilay <eli@barzilay.org>
>> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:11:57 -0500
>> Cc: 24953-done@debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>> > Regardless of the issue reported here, I would advise against setting
>> > the UTF-8 language environment on MS-Windows. [...]
>> > You shouldn't need to do this, not in Emacs 25 anyway.
>>
>> Is it a good idea to use it on linux?
>
> Yes. (And it should be the default on GNU/Linux, at least on most of
> its flavors.)
I built and installed 25.1, and it looks like the default is also
English. (At least according to `current-language-environment'.) Is
that a bug then?
>> (I originally thought that all it gets me is a default encoding for
>> non-ascii files...)
>
> You could customize just that, then.
Using `prefer-coding-system'? Or something else?
> And I don't really understand why that is needed, either, unless you
> want the files you create to be automatically in UTF-8.
Doesn't that make sense if I almost always edit source code for
languages that use utf-8 to read sources?
--
((x=>x(x))(x=>x(x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
- bug#24953: 25.1; Possible inefficiency in UTF-8, Eli Barzilay, 2016/11/15
- bug#24953: 25.1; Possible inefficiency in UTF-8, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/16
- bug#24953: 25.1; Possible inefficiency in UTF-8, Eli Barzilay, 2016/11/16
- bug#24953: 25.1; Possible inefficiency in UTF-8, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/16
- bug#24953: 25.1; Possible inefficiency in UTF-8,
Eli Barzilay <=
- bug#24953: 25.1; Possible inefficiency in UTF-8, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/16
- bug#24953: 25.1; Possible inefficiency in UTF-8, Eli Barzilay, 2016/11/20
- bug#24953: 25.1; Possible inefficiency in UTF-8, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/20
- bug#24953: 25.1; Possible inefficiency in UTF-8, Eli Barzilay, 2016/11/21
- bug#24953: 25.1; Possible inefficiency in UTF-8, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/21