[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#25557: Documentation of format doesn't describe "g" accurately
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#25557: Documentation of format doesn't describe "g" accurately |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jan 2017 22:29:46 +0200 |
> Cc: 25557@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Clément Pit--Claudel <clement.pitclaudel@live.com>
> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 15:06:22 -0500
>
> > ??? (format "%d" 3.0) => "3"
> >
> > Or maybe you didn't think 3.0 was an "integral value" by my
> > definition? I meant by that any value VAL which yields zero when
> > passed through (mod VAL 1.0).
>
> Yup, I misunderstood your definition of integral value. But that still
> doesn't cover formatting e.g. 3.3 as "3.3" instead of "3.30", right?
Yes, but that cannot be a problem, since you said the browsers
supported 2 digits after the decimal.
Or you could get fancier by using %.1f for values for which
(zerop (mod (* 10 VAL) 1.0))
is non-nil.
- bug#25557: Documentation of format doesn't describe "g" accurately, (continued)
- bug#25557: Documentation of format doesn't describe "g" accurately, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/28
- bug#25557: Documentation of format doesn't describe "g" accurately, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2017/01/28
- bug#25557: Documentation of format doesn't describe "g" accurately, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/28
- bug#25557: Documentation of format doesn't describe "g" accurately, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2017/01/28
- bug#25557: Documentation of format doesn't describe "g" accurately, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/28
- bug#25557: Documentation of format doesn't describe "g" accurately, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2017/01/28
- bug#25557: Documentation of format doesn't describe "g" accurately, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/28
- bug#25557: Documentation of format doesn't describe "g" accurately, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2017/01/28
- bug#25557: Documentation of format doesn't describe "g" accurately, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/28
- bug#25557: Documentation of format doesn't describe "g" accurately, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2017/01/28
- bug#25557: Documentation of format doesn't describe "g" accurately,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#25557: Documentation of format doesn't describe "g" accurately, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2017/01/28