[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Apr 2017 12:49:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> > From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net
> > Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:50:00 -0400
> > Cc: 26650@debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el
> > index 94b683dcb9..0aef94f1d2 100644
> > --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el
> > +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el
> > @@ -753,6 +753,8 @@ debugger-mode
> > \\{debugger-mode-map}"
> > (setq truncate-lines t)
> > (set-syntax-table emacs-lisp-mode-syntax-table)
> > + (add-hook 'kill-buffer-hook
> > + (lambda () (if (> (recursion-depth) 0) (top-level))) nil t)
>
> This will throw to top-level when _any_ buffer is killed, as long as
> we are in recursive-edit, no? Is that a good idea? Shouldn't this
> hook do that only for *Backtrace*?
Did you notice that the lambda is added to the buffer-local binding of
the hook? If you did, I don't understand why this would happen. If you
didn't, maybe a line break should be added after the lambda expression?
Michael.
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, (continued)
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, npostavs, 2017/04/25
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, Tino Calancha, 2017/04/25
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, npostavs, 2017/04/25
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, Tino Calancha, 2017/04/25
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/26
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, Tino Calancha, 2017/04/26
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/26
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, npostavs, 2017/04/26
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, Tino Calancha, 2017/04/26
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/26
- bug#26650: 26.0.50; Protect *Backtrace* from accidental killing,
Michael Heerdegen <=