[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#26947: Preserve read-only when debugger with let-bound inhibit-read-
|
From: |
Keith David Bershatsky |
|
Subject: |
bug#26947: Preserve read-only when debugger with let-bound inhibit-read-only t. |
|
Date: |
Wed, 17 May 2017 11:05:59 -0700 |
Yes, let-binding is indeed better than using `setq`. Thank you.
Keith
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
DATE: [05-17-2017 06:34:15] <17 May 2017 09:34:15 -0400>
FROM: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
>
> ***
>
> Actually, the better option is probably to
>
> (let ((inhibit-read-only nil))
>
> around debug, like we already do with various other variables.
>
> ***