bug#26925: Improve /doc/lispref/strings.texi (split-string) documentation

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Jean-Christophe Helary <jean.christophe.helary@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 21:23:57 +0900
> Cc: 26925-done@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > One nit: please don't refer to functions with syntax that looks like a
> > function call, as in (split-string) above, or foo() for C sources.
> > The GNU Coding Standards frown on such references, because they look
> > like a call to a function with no arguments, which is not what is
> > meant there.  We use 'split-string' and 'foo' instead, i.e. the name
> > of the function in quotes.
> 
> Thank you Eli.
> 
> So the function name should have been quoted in both occurrences?
> 
> >> ===========================
> >> Improve documentation of 'split-string'
> >> 
> >> * /doc/lispref/strings.texi 'split-string': change paragraph
> >>  order to improve readability.
> >> ===========================

No, only in the first occurrence.  In the ChangeLog-style entries, we
always put function names in parentheses.