[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#27230: eldoc doc
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: |
bug#27230: eldoc doc |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jun 2017 02:50:24 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:54.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/54.0 |
On 6/27/17 10:51 PM, Charles A. Roelli wrote:
I think it follows the tradition of other *-message functions, which
normally use the calling convention of `message'/`format-message'.
Do we really need a function in "the tradition of other *-message
functions" if we don't ever use it like that?
Agreed. Can you suggest how to word it? Here's what I come up with:
"Display FORMAT-STRING formatted with ARGS as an ElDoc message.
Store the message (if any) in `eldoc-last-message', and return it."
Looks okay to me, aside from what I mentioned above.
Return `eldoc-last-message'."
This is probably non-essential, and we can avoid mentioning it.
I think it once again follows the convention of other *-message
functions, probably for consistency.
Yeah, ok.
- bug#27230: eldoc doc, Charles A. Roelli, 2017/06/04
- bug#27230: eldoc doc, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/06/05
- bug#27230: eldoc doc, Charles A. Roelli, 2017/06/06
- bug#27230: eldoc doc, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/06/06
- bug#27230: eldoc doc, Charles A. Roelli, 2017/06/25
- bug#27230: eldoc doc, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/06/25
- bug#27230: eldoc doc, Charles A. Roelli, 2017/06/25
- bug#27230: eldoc doc, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/06/25
- bug#27230: eldoc doc, Charles A. Roelli, 2017/06/27
- bug#27230: eldoc doc,
Dmitry Gutov <=
- bug#27230: eldoc doc, Charles A. Roelli, 2017/06/28