bug#27674: 26.0.50; cl-progv: strange scoping due to implementation

[npostavs]

Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:

> Sure, but that's something different.  I didn't want a special variable
> in my example.  The doc of `cl-progv' doesn't mention that the symbols
> must correspond to special variables.  Do I miss something?

Oh, you expect cl-progv to bind lexically?  I interpret the first
sentence in its docstring to mean that cl-progv does dynamic binding,
not lexical binding.  Note also, that if it did bind lexically, we would
not be able to compile the body form.

(defmacro cl-progv (symbols values &rest body)
  "Bind SYMBOLS to VALUES dynamically in BODY.
                          ^^^^^^^^^^^